[Babase] Error in ALM Ranks for VIOLA's group 2005-2006
Lacey Maryott
lacey.maryott at duke.edu
Wed Jul 16 12:37:49 EDT 2008
I have made all of the fixes to these ranks, and it turns out the error
only affected ranks data for VIOLA's MALES for JAN-MAY 2005, AUG 2005,
and JUL - NOV 2006.
Again, sorry for this error, but I believe that the ranks table now
accurately represents the ranks for ALM for viola's for 2005 and 2006.
Lacey
Lacey Maryott wrote:
> Susan and I have discovered an error that was made in the 2005, 2006
> ALM rankings for Viola's group. This error centers on male VIB. Any
> male ranks that are currently being used from this time period should
> be re-queried to ensure that the proper data are being used. The most
> this will ever affect the groups' rankings will be 3 positions. VIB
> was not 'ranked' until 2007 but was given credit for being an adult
> male too early. This will shift certain males up or down a couple of
> positions.
>
> Again, this will only affect VIOLA'S group MALE ranks for 2005 and 2006.
>
> Sorry for any inconvenience this may cause. If you have any questions,
> please just ask! :)
>
> Lacey
>
--
Lacey Maryott
Alberts Lab
Department of Biology
Duke University
ph: 919-660-7306
fax: 919-660-7293
Lacey.Maryott at duke.edu
More information about the Babase
mailing list