[Babase] Observers table- no null name

Karl O. Pinc kop at meme.com
Thu Apr 9 11:20:54 EDT 2009


On 04/09/2009 08:12:51 AM, Lacey Maryott wrote:

>> I can't think why you wouldn't just populate OBSERVERS.
>> But then I don't know why the table was made in pending.
> The Table was made in pending because we finally got all of this info  
> pinned down (after a WHOLE lot of hunting and conference calls  
> between Jeanne Susan and I)  and we didn't want to have to do it  
> again.

  But we didn't have a way to integrate it into babase, as
> is the case with all of the tables in pending, so we just put them up  
> until we had you back and you had some time to start integrating them.

Maybe it's time to integrate them?  The only difference I see is
the timeframe column.  Does that need to be added to OBSERVERS?

Karl <kop at meme.com>
Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
                  -- Robert A. Heinlein



More information about the Babase mailing list