[Babase] Correcting PIDs for Missed Pregnancy
Jeanne Altmann
babase@www.eco.princeton.edu
Mon, 01 Aug 2005 20:45:14 -0400
Catherine, we need to make sure that the Babase management manual clarifies
that PID must not be used to determine parity number; only Parity can be
used for that purpose, And Susan, we need to make sure that all data
managers and users keep referring back to the manual----the better the
training and transfer it seems, the less the use of the written
material! not always, but often,
Catherine and I were just talking about this with the issue of twins today.
jeanne
At 02:09 PM 8/1/2005, you wrote:
>Catherine, the procedure you describe below looks right to me.
>
>Susan
>
>>
>>I would create a new row in Biograph for the abortion (same procedure as
>>on this as I follow during demography update with statdate = birthdate,
>>name field left blank, etc.). SIS had pregnancies both before and after
>>this abortion - this abortion will be inserted between SIS6 and SIS7.
>>Before SIS died in 1990, she had a total of 8 pregnancies (not including
>>this one). PID = SIS9 is the next pid in series. I would assign that
>>PID to this birth, but reorder the parity numbers such that the parity
>>for SIS6 is 6, SIS9 is 7, SIS7 is 8, and SIS8 is 9. I think this is
>>consistent with the protocols that Daphne explained last fall (never
>>change a PID but is ok to change the parity). These PID changes would be
>>made in both the Biograph and the Pregs tables. Finally, I would also
>>add a row to the Pregs table for PID = SIS9 with the conceive and resume
>>cycles entered in.
>
>--
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Susan Alberts, Department of Biology, Duke University, Box 90338, Durham
>NC 27708
>919-660-7272 (phone), 919-660-7293 (FAX)
>_______________________________________________
>Babase mailing list
>Babase@www.eco.princeton.edu
>http://www.eco.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/babase