[Babase] UNK or 998 in actor_actees- Followup
Karl O. Pinc
kop at meme.com
Thu Jun 24 09:53:46 EDT 2010
On 06/24/2010 07:14:06 AM, Lacey Maryott Roerish wrote:
> 998 is now being used for 'we know they have a neighbor, but we don't
> know
> who' unk neighbor code. does it make sense to use the same for both?
> Or was
> that your question for me?
Letting you know and seeing if you, or anybody, has a comment.
>
> Should we make another code that makes it easy to distinguish unk
> actor/actee apart from unk neighbor, or doesn't it matter since they
> are so
> unlikely to interact?
The program is going to make 998 disappear for ad-lib interactions,
which is more or less entirely separate from the neighbor codes.
I don't see any particular reason to use something different if
998 is what's being used in the field already.
Karl <kop at meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
More information about the Babase
mailing list