[Babase] Results of comparetables on PREGS

Karl O. Pinc kop at meme.com
Thu May 31 18:28:46 EDT 2007


I'm asking that the original be removed from the archives
and am re-posting this without the data.

On 05/31/2007 04:44:35 PM, kfenn wrote:
> Just for the archives so we know where I left off with these  
> comparison files...
> 
> I changed the matureddates for FED and NAD from ON to BY and added  
> those dates as tdate per Jeanne's review.
> 
> I did, then UNDID, census changes for BLU and LIB.
> 
> I have proofed all the Pregs differences (prior to your fixing the  
> RESUME cycles issue).  All differences between the old and new system  
> were desired changes and there were no errors.  All estimated ddates  
> showed up where they were supposed to.
> 
> I also proofed the cycles differences.  I found errors for three  
> individuals (ORE, HAN, and HUR) that I thought had been fixed in a  
> previous series of corrections... (Their cycles were split in Babase  
> 2.0 when they should have been connected as one cycle.)  I believe I  
> found the source of this error (P values in the real cycgaps table  
> for each t and ddate instead of S and E values).  I will check  
> tomorrow to make sure these are fixed.  Otherwise, the 'new' cycles  
> differences I saw were all additions of automatic mdates.  I did not  
> track down each individually in the database as I have in the past  
> ...but the context of each (the 3 records before and after each  
> difference) indicated that these were just a bunch of additions of  
> automatic mdates.
> 
> I checked the 'added' ddates against the estimated ddates tables and  
> they all match.  I saw no errors there.
> 
> Mdates we checked earlier.
> 
> I didn't spend time on the mtddate sequence files as the changes are  
> probably just a result of my rejoining so many incorrectly 'split'  
> mtddates in Babase 2.0.
> So the files that were ultimately changed today were:
> biograph (maturedates)
> cycles (maturedates)
> real_cycgaps (cycles)
> babase_changelog
> dump
> 
> Hmmm...seems like so little for so much work.
> 
> 
> Tabby
> 
> Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Here's the Babase 1.0/Babase 2.0 comparison
>> for PREGS after I've fixed the conversion code.
>> 
>> This gets rid of the problem of "lost" Resume dates.
>> 
>> What's left seems to fall into two catagories:
>> 
>> New Ddates, which hopefully are the estimated
>> Ddates.
>> 
>> Places where the system has assigned a Resume
>> date but there was no Resume date in foxpro.

<snip>

>> Karl <kop at meme.com>
>> Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
>>                  -- Robert A. Heinlein
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Babase mailing list
>> Babase at www.eco.princeton.edu
>> http://www.eco.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/babase
> 
>-- 
> Tabby Fenn
> Research Assistant
> 
> Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
> 401 Guyot Hall
> Princeton University
> Princeton, NJ  08544
> 
> 609 258-6898 (Ph)
> 609 258-2712 (Fx)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Babase mailing list
> Babase at www.eco.princeton.edu
> http://www.eco.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/babase
> 

Karl <kop at meme.com>
Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
                  -- Robert A. Heinlein



More information about the Babase mailing list