[Babase] REPSTATS and CYCGAPS
Catherine Markham
amarkham at princeton.edu
Mon Jun 12 20:02:52 EDT 2006
I definitely don't understand then - why would it be different for two
females in the same study group?
Thanks,
Catherine
Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> On 06/12/2006 01:36:58 PM, Catherine Markham wrote:
>> Hi Karl,
>>
>> Sorry to be bombarding you with emails, but here's another question for
>> you. I can't quite put my finger on what's going - in part, I think,
>> because I'm not entirely sure what you ended up doing with CYCGAPS.
>>
>> In proofing REPSTATS, I noticed something weird standing out with
>> VOR's earliest records. Seems this is in part do to a data entry
>> mistake (I'll work to correct that), but also because of a gap in
>> monitoring (obviously not a mistake in and of itself, but did lead me
>> to investigate a bit more).
>>
>> Could you check the gaps for VOR and also PRO (I randomly chose her as
>> another female in the same study group)? Both VOR and PRO seem to
>> have been under the same observation scheme, but VOR has a CYCGAPS
>> rows with CYCGAPS.code = E on 1992-02-22 and PRO has a CYCGAPS rows
>> with CYCGAPS.code = E on 1992-02-05. Both of these dates correspond
>> to each female's respective conception dates that month. I can't
>> figure out how you determined they were end of observation dates,
>> though. Could you fill me in (or remind me if we've been over this
>> already) how these markers were identified?
>
> Jeanne sent a list of groups and observation dates. I just used those.
>
> Karl <kop at meme.com>
> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
> -- Robert A. Heinlein
>
> _______________________________________________
> Babase mailing list
> Babase at www.eco.princeton.edu
> http://www.eco.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/babase
More information about the Babase
mailing list