[Babase] Todays cycgaps correction

Karl O. Pinc kop at meme.com
Mon Jan 29 11:53:00 EST 2007


On 01/29/2007 09:01:16 AM, kfenn wrote:
> Karl,
> 
> I'm not sure I understand what you mean, but here's the justification  
> for the NUB change:
> 
> NUB is in Hook's group and there is very little information on named  
> individuals in that group before about 1977, however there is data on  
> unnamed individuals.  NUB may have been under observation around the  
> birth of NUB101 (1976-03-25) as an unnamed individual, so I allowed  
> observation to continue through this date, ending the observation  
> period (in real_cycgaps) on 1976-03-26.  I left the fake_cycgap as is  
> so that the birth would load during a period of observation.

Ok.  Just so long as you've reasons why you didn't declare NUB to
not be under observation at all around that time, and then just
getting rid of the fake cycgap.

Karl <kop at meme.com>
Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
                  -- Robert A. Heinlein



More information about the Babase mailing list