[Babase] Error in ALM Ranks for VIOLA's group 2005-2006

Lacey Maryott lacey.maryott at duke.edu
Wed Jul 16 12:37:49 EDT 2008


I have made all of the fixes to these ranks, and it turns out the error 
only affected ranks data for VIOLA's MALES for JAN-MAY 2005, AUG 2005, 
and JUL - NOV 2006.

Again, sorry for this error, but I believe that the ranks table now 
accurately represents the ranks for ALM for viola's for 2005 and 2006.

Lacey

Lacey Maryott wrote:
> Susan and I have discovered an error that was made in the 2005, 2006 
> ALM rankings for Viola's group. This error centers on male VIB. Any 
> male ranks that are currently being used from this time period should 
> be re-queried to ensure that the proper data are being used. The most 
> this will ever affect the groups' rankings will be 3 positions. VIB 
> was not 'ranked' until 2007 but was given credit for being an adult 
> male too early. This will shift certain males up or down a couple of 
> positions.
>
> Again, this will only affect VIOLA'S group MALE ranks for 2005 and 2006.
>
> Sorry for any inconvenience this may cause. If you have any questions, 
> please just ask! :)
>
> Lacey
>

-- 
Lacey Maryott
Alberts Lab
Department of Biology
Duke University
ph: 919-660-7306
fax: 919-660-7293
Lacey.Maryott at duke.edu 



More information about the Babase mailing list