[Babase] CYCGAPS version14Feb06
Karl O. Pinc
kop at meme.com
Tue Feb 14 17:03:29 EST 2006
On 02/14/2006 03:26:46 PM, Jeanne Altmann wrote:
> Karl, does this work for you, or do you need this in a different
> form? Catherine, if a different form is needed, would you please
> modify?
>
> jeanne
> p.s. I took the document for which we decided dates with Jacinta for
> her project, and I removed the material about ranks, leaving only
> census/repro dates. These are by groups, not individuals, so they
> are conservative, i.e. we may subsequently be able to decrease the
> gap dates for some individuals.
Here's what I got from the document:
All females have been under continuous observation from 1 July, 1971
except:
The unborn.
Proton's after Dec 31, 1990.
Anyone in Altos, Dotty's, or Nyayo's from Jan 1, 1990 through
Dec 31, 1995, inclusive.
Is this the correct starting point?
(I can tell this is going to cause problems because you can't have
a sexual cycle event recorded during a period in which you're not under
observation. One solution would be for me to tell the system
the individuals are under observation on those days on which
there are Mdates, Tdates, or Ddates. Or maybe the answer is to
get down and dirty and have detailed gaps for each individual.)
Karl <kop at meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
More information about the Babase
mailing list