[Babase] new sexskin error_death while ppa
Karl O. Pinc
kop at meme.com
Wed May 14 15:03:25 EDT 2008
On 05/14/2008 01:54:27 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> On 05/14/2008 01:24:02 PM, kfenn wrote:
>> ERROR: Sxid 12946: Cid 20263: 2000-02-14: There is no sexual cycle
>> (CYCLES) to which this row can be assigned
>>
>> I checked a few things:
>> SOU last zdate is 1999-08-22.
>> She gives birth on 2000-02-14
>> All her observed sizes after the problematic date (2000-02-14) are
>> size 0 (obviously she's ppa).
>> She dies in 2000-11-27.
>> So the female is ppa and there shouldn't be a row for her in cycles,
>> yet there are observations that she is ppa and we don't want to
>> simply lost those data. How are other ppa females treated and why
>> do you suppose death during ppa is causing problems with the CYCLES
>> validations?
> How about this? We change the rule about assignment to a sexual
> cycle for sexskins so that any sexskins measurements > 0 on or
> after birth belong to the next cycle, but if it's a 0 measurement
> then it belongs to the conception cycle.
Now that I think about it I seem to recall that the rule we started
with, the one that caused us Mdate problems because it assigned
all sexskins measurements to the conception cycle, was constructed
that way to deal with ppa-with-death. It got those measurements
associated with a cycle.
Karl <kop at meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
More information about the Babase
mailing list