[Babase] ADLIB data -- consortships and more
Karl O. Pinc
babase@www.eco.princeton.edu
Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:35:59 +0000
On 10/22/2005 09:16:30 AM, Susan Alberts wrote:
> So, leaving the consortships in ad libs and not bringing them into
> interact is purposeful and makes sense.
>
> However, the same should not be true of M and E. I believe that M and
> E should be treated like G and A. Can you enlighten?
Well, no. I suspect it just wasn't done for some reason.
Let's fix it in the new system. I'll put it on my
TODO list to go through the adlibs
and move M and Es into INTERACT. However, it's not
something that will go any quicker if I do it in
the conversion, so let's wait until after the data
is moved but before we go live and start putting
pison data in. Once it's written I can hook it
to the end of the data conversion at any point.
Sound good?
Karl <kop@meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein