[Babase] Re: Predation Coding Scheme
Susan Alberts
alberts at duke.edu
Mon Mar 10 23:41:41 EDT 2008
> Regards data entry error. Don't forget the "have two different
> people enter the data and then compare" method of error detection.
Thanks for the reminder Karl. In this case, the sheer volume of the
data may make this impossible for us at this point. As a starting
point, what if Lacey and Lindsey (who will be entering the data)
duplicate some specified chunk of it -- say, one year for each of the
groups? - and see what the rate of difference/error is. Lacey, would
this be possible? I do think that some thing like this will be
important especially if you are proposing to enter directly from the
notes. This means that you will simultaneously be "translating" the
data in coded format, and entering it. It would be good to get a
sense of how error-prone this is (although I accept your point that
it is not all that difficult with these data).
And, of course, we will have two people proofing, with a switch in
roles to make sure that the enterer is not re-duplicating her
original errors.
let me know if anyone has further thoughts.
Susan
>
> Karl <kop at meme.com>
> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
> -- Robert A. Heinlein
>
> _______________________________________________
> Babase mailing list
> Babase at www.eco.princeton.edu
> http://www.eco.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/babase
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Babase
mailing list