[Babase] Re: Hook's female question
kfenn
kfenn at princeton.edu
Wed May 9 10:35:09 EDT 2007
If Scott is using the online system, Tatu does have a bstatus of 0. She
has no bstatus is the Babase1.0 (FoxPro ). In fact, there are a number
of empty bstatus values in Babase 1.0 but there are no empty (null)
bstatus values in Babase 2.0. As I recall, all empty fields in FoxPro
are interpreted to be 0 value so they probably converted to real 0's
rather than converting to Null values in Babase 2.0.
Jeanne, Susan, were these empty values entered in Babase 1.0 with the
intention of indicating 'Null' (no information at all?), or did you want
bstatus to never be Null?
I'm emailing this to the listserve since the problem just got a little
bigger.
Tabby
Jeanne Altmann wrote:
> Tabby went through notebooks before I came in, and I've just gone
> through;
>
> The unknown mom seems correct,
> Bstatus=0 is wrong,
> Should be the next category up,
> Thanks for catching this Scott; Tabby, when you can, please do a search
> for any other bstatus=0 for which we don't have a mom identified.
> jeanne
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Susan Alberts [mailto:alberts at duke.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 8:52 PM
> To: Jeanne Altmann
> Cc: lacey.maryott at duke.edu; R. Scott Davidson
> Subject: Hook's female question
>
> Jeanne,
>
> Scott says:
>
>
>> Also I stumbled across one baboon which has a a bstatus of zero
>> (indicating that the baboons birth was known within a few days) but
>> with an unknown mother.
>> This individual was tatu, born in 1976 to hooks group. I mentioned
>> this to Lacy earlier today as well.
>>
>>
> Do you have any insight into this or is it just an error?
>
> Susan
>
>
--
Tabby Fenn
Research Assistant
Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
401 Guyot Hall
Princeton University
Princeton, NJ 08544
609 258-6898 (Ph)
609 258-2712 (Fx)
More information about the Babase
mailing list