[Babase] Observers table- no null name
Karl O. Pinc
kop at meme.com
Thu Apr 9 11:20:54 EDT 2009
On 04/09/2009 08:12:51 AM, Lacey Maryott wrote:
>> I can't think why you wouldn't just populate OBSERVERS.
>> But then I don't know why the table was made in pending.
> The Table was made in pending because we finally got all of this info
> pinned down (after a WHOLE lot of hunting and conference calls
> between Jeanne Susan and I) and we didn't want to have to do it
> again.
But we didn't have a way to integrate it into babase, as
> is the case with all of the tables in pending, so we just put them up
> until we had you back and you had some time to start integrating them.
Maybe it's time to integrate them? The only difference I see is
the timeframe column. Does that need to be added to OBSERVERS?
Karl <kop at meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
More information about the Babase
mailing list