[Babase] Group 99
Catherine Markham
babase@www.eco.princeton.edu
Thu, 28 Apr 2005 18:28:54 -0400
Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> On 04/28/2005 04:02:25 PM, Catherine Markham wrote:
>
>>> You may get some useful information from comparing this with
>>> Census rows, as there's a 1-to-1 correspondance between
>>> Census and Members for the "old style" rows.
>>
>>
>> I think I follow what you're saying. There are only 30,765 records
>> in Census that place an animal in Group 99. The 12 row discrepancy
>> between Census and Members is due to interpolation (there are twelve
>> records in Members that place an animal in Group 99 with origin code
>> = I).
>>
>> The other origin codes that do show up with Group 99 in Members are:
>> E, M, and S.
>
>
> So. These are all from pre-babase data. For whatever reason when
> we loaded the data into babase for the first time we used group 99.
Not all, right? The interpolated rows are post BaBase, aren't they?
>
> Karl <kop@meme.com>
> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
> -- Robert A. Heinlein
>
> _______________________________________________
> Babase mailing list
> Babase@www.eco.princeton.edu
> http://www.eco.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/babase
--
Catherine Markham
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Princeton University
Phone: (609) 258-6898
Fax: (609) 258-2712