[Babase] Results of comparetables on PREGS
Karl O. Pinc
kop at meme.com
Thu May 31 18:28:46 EDT 2007
I'm asking that the original be removed from the archives
and am re-posting this without the data.
On 05/31/2007 04:44:35 PM, kfenn wrote:
> Just for the archives so we know where I left off with these
> comparison files...
>
> I changed the matureddates for FED and NAD from ON to BY and added
> those dates as tdate per Jeanne's review.
>
> I did, then UNDID, census changes for BLU and LIB.
>
> I have proofed all the Pregs differences (prior to your fixing the
> RESUME cycles issue). All differences between the old and new system
> were desired changes and there were no errors. All estimated ddates
> showed up where they were supposed to.
>
> I also proofed the cycles differences. I found errors for three
> individuals (ORE, HAN, and HUR) that I thought had been fixed in a
> previous series of corrections... (Their cycles were split in Babase
> 2.0 when they should have been connected as one cycle.) I believe I
> found the source of this error (P values in the real cycgaps table
> for each t and ddate instead of S and E values). I will check
> tomorrow to make sure these are fixed. Otherwise, the 'new' cycles
> differences I saw were all additions of automatic mdates. I did not
> track down each individually in the database as I have in the past
> ...but the context of each (the 3 records before and after each
> difference) indicated that these were just a bunch of additions of
> automatic mdates.
>
> I checked the 'added' ddates against the estimated ddates tables and
> they all match. I saw no errors there.
>
> Mdates we checked earlier.
>
> I didn't spend time on the mtddate sequence files as the changes are
> probably just a result of my rejoining so many incorrectly 'split'
> mtddates in Babase 2.0.
> So the files that were ultimately changed today were:
> biograph (maturedates)
> cycles (maturedates)
> real_cycgaps (cycles)
> babase_changelog
> dump
>
> Hmmm...seems like so little for so much work.
>
>
> Tabby
>
> Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here's the Babase 1.0/Babase 2.0 comparison
>> for PREGS after I've fixed the conversion code.
>>
>> This gets rid of the problem of "lost" Resume dates.
>>
>> What's left seems to fall into two catagories:
>>
>> New Ddates, which hopefully are the estimated
>> Ddates.
>>
>> Places where the system has assigned a Resume
>> date but there was no Resume date in foxpro.
<snip>
>> Karl <kop at meme.com>
>> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
>> -- Robert A. Heinlein
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Babase mailing list
>> Babase at www.eco.princeton.edu
>> http://www.eco.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/babase
>
>--
> Tabby Fenn
> Research Assistant
>
> Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
> 401 Guyot Hall
> Princeton University
> Princeton, NJ 08544
>
> 609 258-6898 (Ph)
> 609 258-2712 (Fx)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Babase mailing list
> Babase at www.eco.princeton.edu
> http://www.eco.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/babase
>
Karl <kop at meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
More information about the Babase
mailing list