[Babase] Re: next conversion

Karl O. Pinc kop at meme.com
Wed May 23 11:49:50 EDT 2007


On 05/23/2007 10:03:38 AM, kfenn wrote:

> Thanks, Karl,  That was helpful.  Current procedure is to input all  
> the cycles first (6 months worth), then put in births (6 months  
> worth).  Sounds like we need to adjust this in the new system to do  
> an alternating, month-by-month update of each.  In most instances  
> there won't be a conflict, but in cases of an abortion, I imagine the  
> 'birth' would have to be registered in the system before it would  
> allow a resume cycle to be input.

Yes, _if_ the system knows there's a pregnancy (the PREGS row exists),
otherwise it just figures it's a really long cycle.

Karl <kop at meme.com>
Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
                  -- Robert A. Heinlein



More information about the Babase mailing list