[Babase] MEMBERS Comparison - absent on birth
Karl O. Pinc
babase@www.eco.princeton.edu
Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:28:19 +0000
On 09/30/2005 10:12:44 AM, Catherine Markham wrote:
>
> My guess is that the root of the trouble is the fact that WEG was
> born on a day when he was absent on the group census. (Again, for
> this particular case, we sorted it out because WEG's correct birthday
> is 3 February 2005.)
>
> Is this an issue for the interpolation rules?
This looks like a problem in the interpolation implimentation,
not the rules. If you could read over the rules and confirm that
WEG really should not wind up in group 9 by the rules
I'll fix up the program. (I may have found a different
problem too while adding and deleting the absence on
2005-02-02, but maybe it's the same problem....)
Thanks for finding this.
Karl <kop@meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein