[Babase] new sexskin error_death while ppa
Laurence
lgesquie at princeton.edu
Fri May 16 17:01:08 EDT 2008
I didn't read follow the all conversation but I am reading this right,
you are proposing to replace the sex skin of 0.5 by 1?
I don't think we want that.
Laurence
Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> On 05/15/2008 08:18:37 PM, Susan Alberts wrote:
>> I suspect that Jeanne has not been following this thread. To me, the
>> decision you propose below sounds fine. My understanding is that the
>> decision wrt the 0.5 measurements stuff (if you are talking about sex
>> skins
>
> Yes.
>
> ) was that it will be rounded up to a 1 and we will NOT
>> implement a 0.5 rule.
>>
>> I will send JA an email to make sure that she is checking this thread
>> and that you all have requested final input from her on sex skin stuff.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> On May 15, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 05/15/2008 02:23:57 PM, kfenn wrote:
>>>> Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> How about this? We change the rule about assignment to a sexual
>>>>>>> cycle for sexskins so that any sexskins measurements > 0 on or
>>>>>>> after birth belong to the next cycle, but if it's a 0 measurement
>>>>>>> then it belongs to the conception cycle.
>>>
>>>> Jeanne, can we get your OK on this?
>
>
> Karl <kop at meme.com>
> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
> -- Robert A. Heinlein
>
> _______________________________________________
> Babase mailing list
> Babase at www.eco.princeton.edu
> http://www.eco.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/babase
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lgesquie.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 314 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.eco.princeton.edu/pipermail/babase/attachments/20080516/cc08df35/lgesquie.vcf
More information about the Babase
mailing list