[Babase] ranker again
Susan Alberts
alberts at duke.edu
Thu Oct 5 13:27:53 EDT 2006
Jun (Karl please read also and provide any feedback),
A few more thoughts about ranker after several conversations between
Jeanne and I.
Perhaps the best way to describe the hierarchical relationships
between rank types is as follows:
ALF is the "master" within-female ranking. ADF and JUF (juvenile
females, not a currently designated rank type, but it should be) need
to be derivable from ALF and consistency must be enforced between the
relative rankings in each.
ALM is the "master" within-male ranking. ADM and JUM (juvenile males,
not a currently designated rank type, but it should be) need to be
derivable from ALF and consistency must be enforced between the
relative rankings in each.
ALL is the ranking for both sexes combined. We do not want to enforce
consistency between ALL and ALF or ALM. The within sex rank types and
the ALL ranktype are really two different categories and there is no
clear hierarchical relationship between them.
The rnktype FYM should be deleted. We will not population this
rnktype with the data available.
At some point in the future there may be rnktypes that need to be
derived from ALL but this is not obvious to us at the moment, so ALL
is not at the top of a hierarchy in the way that ALF and ALM are.
I hope this helps, please let us know if there are questions.
Susan
-----------------------------------------------
Susan Alberts, Dept. Biology, Duke University, Durham NC 27708. Phone
919-660-7272, Fax 919-660-7293. alberts at duke.edu
More information about the Babase
mailing list