[Babase] Interpolation (MEMBERS) changes

Karl O. Pinc babase@www.eco.princeton.edu
Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:17:29 +0000


On 04/04/2005 09:28:49 AM, Catherine Markham wrote:
> My concern wasn't so much about the group associated with the members  
> row, but rather the date.  The fact that the group would be "unknown"  
> is fine by me, but it seemed misleading to automatically have that  
> date pulled into members in cases where the the birth status is a  
> rough estimate .
> Anyway, just my two cents on a relatively minor point.  With regard  
> to the bigger picture, I think the other changes Karl mentioned to  
> the members table sound good.

There's a good conversation to be had here.  Let's do it during the
lab meeting.

Karl <kop@meme.com>
Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
                 -- Robert A. Heinlein