[Babase] New Ranker login and misused groomings

kfenn kfenn at princeton.edu
Wed Apr 2 12:57:03 EDT 2008


Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2008 09:29:29 AM, kfenn wrote:
>   So the bottom line seems to be that new Ranker
>> incorrectly adds grooming data to both the male and female agonism 
>> matrices.
>
> Does the ranker ask for an interaction class (ACTS.Class)?
I had that same question, but I don't see an option for that anywhere.
> The old one did and it seemed like it might be useful to be
> able to produce different sorts of matrices, even if the
> only ones recorded in RANKS are the agonisims.
>
Yes, it would be.  There is still some additional functionality that I 
hope we can eventually build in.
FWIW, I think we are also missing the sub-ranker program to generate the 
ADF ranks.... unless its hidden in a menu option somewhere.  It could be.

Tabby

> Karl <kop at meme.com>
> Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
>                  -- Robert A. Heinlein
>
> _______________________________________________
> Babase mailing list
> Babase at www.eco.princeton.edu
> http://www.eco.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/babase

-- 
Tabby Fenn
Research Assistant

Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
401 Guyot Hall
Princeton University
Princeton, NJ  08544

609 258-6898 (Ph)
609 258-2712 (Fx)



More information about the Babase mailing list