[Babase] Re: next conversion
Karl O. Pinc
kop at meme.com
Wed May 23 11:49:50 EDT 2007
On 05/23/2007 10:03:38 AM, kfenn wrote:
> Thanks, Karl, That was helpful. Current procedure is to input all
> the cycles first (6 months worth), then put in births (6 months
> worth). Sounds like we need to adjust this in the new system to do
> an alternating, month-by-month update of each. In most instances
> there won't be a conflict, but in cases of an abortion, I imagine the
> 'birth' would have to be registered in the system before it would
> allow a resume cycle to be input.
Yes, _if_ the system knows there's a pregnancy (the PREGS row exists),
otherwise it just figures it's a really long cycle.
Karl <kop at meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
More information about the Babase
mailing list