[Babase] Interpolation (MEMBERS) changes
Karl O. Pinc
babase@www.eco.princeton.edu
Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:17:29 +0000
On 04/04/2005 09:28:49 AM, Catherine Markham wrote:
> My concern wasn't so much about the group associated with the members
> row, but rather the date. The fact that the group would be "unknown"
> is fine by me, but it seemed misleading to automatically have that
> date pulled into members in cases where the the birth status is a
> rough estimate .
> Anyway, just my two cents on a relatively minor point. With regard
> to the bigger picture, I think the other changes Karl mentioned to
> the members table sound good.
There's a good conversation to be had here. Let's do it during the
lab meeting.
Karl <kop@meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein