[Babase] New Ranker login and misused groomings
kfenn
kfenn at princeton.edu
Wed Apr 2 12:57:03 EDT 2008
Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2008 09:29:29 AM, kfenn wrote:
> So the bottom line seems to be that new Ranker
>> incorrectly adds grooming data to both the male and female agonism
>> matrices.
>
> Does the ranker ask for an interaction class (ACTS.Class)?
I had that same question, but I don't see an option for that anywhere.
> The old one did and it seemed like it might be useful to be
> able to produce different sorts of matrices, even if the
> only ones recorded in RANKS are the agonisims.
>
Yes, it would be. There is still some additional functionality that I
hope we can eventually build in.
FWIW, I think we are also missing the sub-ranker program to generate the
ADF ranks.... unless its hidden in a menu option somewhere. It could be.
Tabby
> Karl <kop at meme.com>
> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
> -- Robert A. Heinlein
>
> _______________________________________________
> Babase mailing list
> Babase at www.eco.princeton.edu
> http://www.eco.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/babase
--
Tabby Fenn
Research Assistant
Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
401 Guyot Hall
Princeton University
Princeton, NJ 08544
609 258-6898 (Ph)
609 258-2712 (Fx)
More information about the Babase
mailing list