[Babase] Group 99
Catherine Markham
babase@www.eco.princeton.edu
Wed, 04 May 2005 08:56:49 -0400
> I agree that we should abandon 99. I just re-checked all my original
> males files and confirmed that I never used 99, only 9, and I always
> assigned a male zero for alone - in my database, there was only a single
> integer value allowed for wherever the male was. So if it was used
> before babase it must have come from somewhere other than my files. And
> given that none of us remembers or quite understands it, we should
> jettison it.
>
> Susan
So I should change the group id for males currently in Members and
Census with Group 99 to Group 10, right? Do you want me to look into
these case by case, or simply do a quick replace with FoxPro commands?
Catherine