[Babase] new sexskin error_death while ppa
Karl O. Pinc
kop at meme.com
Fri May 16 11:47:33 EDT 2008
On 05/15/2008 08:18:37 PM, Susan Alberts wrote:
> I suspect that Jeanne has not been following this thread. To me, the
> decision you propose below sounds fine. My understanding is that the
> decision wrt the 0.5 measurements stuff (if you are talking about sex
> skins
Yes.
) was that it will be rounded up to a 1 and we will NOT
> implement a 0.5 rule.
>
> I will send JA an email to make sure that she is checking this thread
> and that you all have requested final input from her on sex skin
> stuff.
Thanks.
> On May 15, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
>>
>> On 05/15/2008 02:23:57 PM, kfenn wrote:
>>> Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>>
>>>>>> How about this? We change the rule about assignment to a sexual
>>>>>> cycle for sexskins so that any sexskins measurements > 0 on or
>>>>>> after birth belong to the next cycle, but if it's a 0 measurement
>>>>>> then it belongs to the conception cycle.
>>
>>> Jeanne, can we get your OK on this?
Karl <kop at meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
More information about the Babase
mailing list