[Babase] new sexskin error_death while ppa

Susan Alberts alberts at duke.edu
Thu May 15 21:18:37 EDT 2008


I suspect that Jeanne has not been following this thread. To me, the  
decision you propose below sounds fine. My understanding is that the  
decision wrt the 0.5 measurements stuff (if you are talking about sex  
skins) was that it will be rounded up to a 1 and we will NOT implement  
a 0.5 rule.

I will send JA an email to make sure that she is checking this thread  
and that you all have requested final input from her on sex skin stuff.

Susan

On May 15, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:

>
> On 05/15/2008 02:23:57 PM, kfenn wrote:
>> Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
>>>>> How about this?  We change the rule about assignment to a sexual
>>>>> cycle for sexskins so that any sexskins measurements > 0 on or
>>>>> after birth belong to the next cycle, but if it's a 0 measurement
>>>>> then it belongs to the conception cycle.
>
>> Jeanne, can we get your OK on this?
>
> Be good to get approval before I do the Psion data structures
> table so I can make all the changes in one go.
>
> Also, the sexkins 0.5 measurement stuff.
>
> Karl <kop at meme.com>
> Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
>                 -- Robert A. Heinlein
>
> _______________________________________________
> Babase mailing list
> Babase at www.eco.princeton.edu
> http://www.eco.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/babase

--------------------------------------------------------
Susan Alberts, Dept of Biology, Duke University, Box 90338, Durham NC  
27708, 919-660-7272 (Ph), 919-660-7293 (Fax)



More information about the Babase mailing list