[Babase] New Ranker login and misused groomings
Karl O. Pinc
kop at meme.com
Wed Apr 2 12:38:52 EDT 2008
On 04/02/2008 09:29:29 AM, kfenn wrote:
So the bottom line seems to be that new Ranker
> incorrectly adds grooming data to both the male and female agonism
> matrices.
Does the ranker ask for an interaction class (ACTS.Class)?
The old one did and it seemed like it might be useful to be
able to produce different sorts of matrices, even if the
only ones recorded in RANKS are the agonisims.
Karl <kop at meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
More information about the Babase
mailing list