[Babase] Group 99

Susan Alberts babase@www.eco.princeton.edu
Mon, 2 May 2005 10:37:06 -0400


>yes, this is what we had found, but this does not explain 99 vs 9; 
>they seem to have been in neither group those days, and so we 
>settled on group 9 unless you have thoughts otherwise,
>jeanne

I'm not sure I could make this decision until I have a better 
understanding of how we have decided to use 99 (or not). My current 
inclination would be to use 9 as you did, but that is because I don't 
understand how we would want to use 99. Can someone refresh my memory 
on this or describe the rationale?

Susan

>At 08:56 AM 02/05/2005, you wrote:
>
>>>Snames
>>>There are 47 distinct snames associated with Group 99 in Members. 
>>>Two of these - Music and Mwezi - are females (I'll investigate).
>>
>>I suspect that the Music and Mwezi rows come from the period just 
>>after the Lodge Group fission when Mwezi and Music (MWE's daughter) 
>>were moving back and forth a bit between NZI and JOY groups and we 
>>didn't always know where they were. This is just by way of giving 
>>you a starting clue to figure out what might be going on.
>>
>>S
>>--
>>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>Susan Alberts, Associate Professor Department of Biology, Duke 
>>University, Box 90338, Durham NC 27708 phone 919-660-7272  fax 
>>919-660-7293
>>_______________________________________________
>>Babase mailing list
>>Babase@www.eco.princeton.edu
>>http://www.eco.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/babase
>
>_______________________________________________
>Babase mailing list
>Babase@www.eco.princeton.edu
>http://www.eco.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/babase


-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Susan Alberts, Department of Biology, Duke University, Box 90338, 
Durham NC 27708
919-660-7272 (phone), 919-660-7293 (FAX)